Chapter 7: Cyberbeg.com and Online Begging
In Chapter 7 of The Genius of Money we learn a little about
the rich origins and history of begging. The author talks about the cross class
interaction of giving money to a beggar and the associated benefits for both
parties when a donation is made. From a beggars standpoint they receive a
financial gift that they can use to better their quality of life, and from a
donors point of view they are giving to the less needy. It is a conscious self-imposed choice that
leads one to the path of enlightenment. There is a sense of connection between
you and the person you are donating to, even for a split second.
With the rise of new technology, specifically a website
called Cyberbeg.com people can now go online to donate to your local homeless
or beggar. This relatively new idea
adds additional value for the common beggars as they can now be exposed to more
people than they otherwise would begging on the streets, but it also grants
them physical relief of having to stand in the streets and beg. They can go do
something else with their time. For beggars perhaps this idea is a win, but the
author discusses his experience with the site. Not only does he mention he
wouldn’t want to visit such a site, which I completely agree with, but he talks
about how he felt like a consumer rather than a donor when using the site.
There was no spiritual connection or sense compassion when donating through an
online portal.
What do you guys think, would it make a difference to you
guys when you donate? Which do you prefer?
Chapter 15: The Transcendentalist and
the Immigrant
In Chapter 15 we are introduced
to two different approaches of money in America. The first are the views of
Ralph Waldo Emerson who proposes that almost all people who are wealthy have
that wealth because they inherited it and the wealth stays amongst the wealthy.
He dislikes this idea and questions it. He believes that the wealthy are
shaping the unequal distribution of wealth and that nobody should have the
right. Emerson instructs the rich to channel their inner transcendentalist and
help those who are less fortunate. His ideas would lead to the “evolution of
public charities in America.
Different from Emerson, Eva
Hoffman focuses on the relationship of money and people’s personal desires. She
wonders if what people desire is actually what they want or a product of
advertising and other social influences. She believes that desire is more
heavily correlated to the worldly and material rather than the spiritual. Both
Emerson and Hoffman discuss the difference between spiritual and materialistic
and how one must channel their spiritual side to find deeper meaning. I think
both Emerson and Hoffman have profound thoughts on the subject and offer interesting
styles of delivering their message.